Comments on: Content vs. Conversation http://www.ucredible.com/OTR/2007/08/16/content-vs-conversation/ Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:34:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2 By: john cass http://www.ucredible.com/OTR/2007/08/16/content-vs-conversation/#comment-11457 john cass Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:17:17 +0000 http://www.ucredible.com/OTR/2007/08/16/content-vs-conversation/#comment-11457 Greg, was that community a forum? Greg, was that community a forum?

]]> By: GregPC http://www.ucredible.com/OTR/2007/08/16/content-vs-conversation/#comment-11458 GregPC Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:26:05 +0000 http://www.ucredible.com/OTR/2007/08/16/content-vs-conversation/#comment-11458 Yes it was (and is) a community site. They want to maintain a higher degree of control over the content - or at least over whom gets to contribute content rather than just comments. Yes it was (and is) a community site. They want to maintain a higher degree of control over the content - or at least over whom gets to contribute content rather than just comments.

]]> By: john cass http://www.ucredible.com/OTR/2007/08/16/content-vs-conversation/#comment-11492 john cass Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:52:10 +0000 http://www.ucredible.com/OTR/2007/08/16/content-vs-conversation/#comment-11492 That reminds me of several conversations I've had with media measurement companies, like Nielson buzzmetrics and umbria. These companies have to form partnership aggreements with forum hosts to spider their content. Is it the engagement they are worried about or how you might use what people say outside the forum? That reminds me of several conversations I’ve had with media measurement companies, like Nielson buzzmetrics and umbria. These companies have to form partnership aggreements with forum hosts to spider their content.

Is it the engagement they are worried about or how you might use what people say outside the forum?

]]>